Sean “Diddy” Combs, Sex Traffic and SEAN RACEET JUDGE “closed after seven weeks on Friday, as the rapper defense team and persecution completed the closing arguments.
The two sides saw wins and losses throughout the trial, but experts claimed that Diddy “could be cooked” for a specific charge as the jury prepares to deliberate. Following his arrest in September 2024, the singer “last night” was accused of sex, affection and transportation to participate in prostitution. He has stated that he is not guilty of all charges.
The ex -Danity Kane and Diddy Protégé, Aubrey O’Day, have been following the trial and are not sure what the result will be. Although he personally believes that the rapper is “guilty of all charges”, the musician is not sold to the prosecution in court.
“The rational side and justice that brings me a good amount of what I do today says that the answer should be the prosecution, the law and this is conflicting with what I want personally,” he told Extra.
Said: “I don’t know if the prosecutor’s office showed [Diddy’s crimes] Without a doubt. “”
During the closing arguments, prosecutors argued that Diddy led a suspected criminal company with complete control. They said that the jury listened to witnesses, saw texts, saw the bank records, and heard an audio showing the rapper committing the crime after the crime for decades. According to the prosecution, the government showed that Diddy did not take a response. To date, Diddy was able to escape the crime due to his money and his power, said United States Assistant Solutionary Christine Slavik. “This stops now.”
This is where experts say things are from each position against Diddy with the jury about to deliberate.
Transport to participate in prostitution
In terms of transportation to devote itself to the load of prostitution, a Diddy could have an expert in Fox News News.
“Sexual workers were very clear about their role and purpose of being transported through state lines; it was by sex and not something else,” said criminal defense lawyer Eric Faddis. “Diddy can be cooked in this charge.”
However, the defense found a way to show the jury a different explanation in an attempt to undermine the government’s argument. “The defense got an employee of one of the companies to say that Diddy was only buying the time of escorts and no sexual performance, which the jury could use as a basis for acquitt Diddy in transport positions,” said Faddis, a founding partner of Varner Faddis based in Colorado.
“Diddy can be cooked in this charge.”
Eric Faddis, criminal defense lawyer
Conspiracy of Racketeering
It is unlikely that the jury may not find Diddy to be guilty of a criminal defense attack, John W. Day told Fox News Digital.
“The only thing Diddy can expect and his team is a miracle where the jurors do not buy the government’s statement that it was to become and Diddy was the head of a criminal empire dedicated to fulfilling his wishes,” said Founder of the New Mexico Law Law, John Day Law. “A defense victory is more likely if the jurors are in conflict with the positions of the struggle and cannot reach a unanimous verdict. This could lead to a jury hanging in one or more of the allegations.But the jurors spent the entire trial waiting to see how Diddy’s lawyers rejected the massive case against him, and they resisted without any witnesses. of the charges, but it is unlikely. “
According to the legal expert, the prosecutor’s office “presented overwhelming tests” that Diddy “presided over this small kingdom of criminal activity designed to make it happy and made a convincing case to the jury that this found with all the elements of sex trace, sex traffic and transport for prostitution.”
“The Prosecutor’s Office may withstand acquittal or a jury hung on some of the counts, but prosecutors really need a sentence for the struggle to claim total victory,” said Day. “ Again, this can be a difficult position to condemn if the jurors do not buy the theory that all this business empire was engaged in sex and transport traffic to participate in prostitution.But the defense had to convince at least one jury that the case was not that it was not, and that the testimonies lied to save their necks.And this is a difficult sale to sell to a jury who spent a horrifying witness there.
Sex traffic by force, fraud or coercion
Things are not so clear in sex traffic burden, an expert in Fox News Digital said. Diddy was charged with sexual traffic to two of his ex -partners, Cassie Ventura and Jane, who testified under a pseudonym. The prosecution claimed that the rapper transported both women through state lines, and then forced them to have sex with male escorts while looking.
“In a cross exam, both Cassie and Jane admitted voluntarily to some of the” Freak offs “, which could cause the jurors to be asked if all the romantic meetings could have been agreed,” said Faddis.
“Both Cassie and Jane admitted to voluntarily ingesting drugs before” Freak Falls “, which can reduce the prosecution’s coercion argument.”
The criminal defense lawyer said that Cassie and Jane gave both “convincing and evocative testimonies that detailed physical abuse and financial coercion.”
#experts #Sean #Diddy #COMBS #cooked #load #key #sexual #crimes #experts #jury #preparation #deliberation
Image Source : nypost.com